The Rationality Behind Immigration Preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
What drives stated preferences about the number of foreigners? Is it self-interest as stressed by the political economy of immigration? Does social interaction affect this preference or is the immigration preference completely in line with the preference for the aggregate population size? In this paper we distinguish each of these categories and show for the case of the Netherlands that each of these elements applies although the effect of population size preference and the self-interest are the most important elements. There is a clear divide across educational levels as the lower educated are more against immigration than the highly educated. Experience with foreigners arising from social contact matters in positively appreciating immigrants, especially if one meets (non-western) foreigners at work and school. Contact with foreigners while going out decreases the preference for immigrants. The ethnic composition of the neighbourhood in which one lives does not exert a noticeable effect on the evaluation of the number of foreigners present. The biggest effect on immigration preferences is, however, the aggregate population size preference of respondents. * Comments by Frans Willekens and Aat Liefbroer are gratefully acknowledged.
منابع مشابه
Investigating the Rationality of Behavioral Economics in Mental Accounting by Studying Laboratory Economics
The purpose of this study is to investigate the rationality of behavioral economics in mental accounting by studying laboratory economics. Undoubtedly, economic man, whose fundamental characteristic is rationality, is the starting point for economic analysis. In conventional economics, the premise of rationality is the cornerstone and the premise of all economic theories. However, critics of ec...
متن کاملEvolution and Human Nature
rom an economic perspective on individual decision making, human beings have three key characteristics: preferences, beliefs and rationality. Beliefs are the probabilities with which people think various outcomes will occur, conditional on information that might be available. Preferences are the rankings over the set of gambles that are based on such beliefs over the outcomes. Rationality is th...
متن کاملChoice axioms for a positive value of information
Debates around the assumption of rationality in economic theory abound and are too numerous to be listed here. Traditionally, rationality of a decision maker is captured by a set of (testable) axioms, whose meaning and strength can be discussed. These rationality axioms however do not all have the same status in the sense that they bear on different things. One could actually distinguish three ...
متن کاملPreferences for Immigration Restriction and Opinions about Immigrants’ Economic Impacts
We investigate the importance of citizens’ opinions about economic impacts of immigration in their countries to their preferences for immigration restriction. We focus on personal views regarding how immigrants would affect the national labour market and the domestic public finance. Our analysis of survey data from 7 EU countries during the period 2002-2003 suggests that personal opinions about...
متن کاملFraming Labels and Immigration Policy Attitudes in the Iowa Caucuses: ‘‘Trying to Out-Tancredo Tancredo’’
We use an experiment built into a series of surveys of Iowa voters during the 2008 Iowa Caucus campaign to test the effect of differing group framing labels on immigration policy preferences. We find that certain framing labels matter, but only among Republican partisans for whom the immigration issue is important. We also find that issue importance produces more conservative policy preferences...
متن کامل